|
Hyson Cells with concreteComparison with other geocellsConventional geocells were primarily developed for containing soils on embankments. The thin-walled Hyson Cell has particular advantage for use with concrete.(1) Geocells made from thick plastic sheetingCells made from thick plastic sheeting will tend to be considerably more expensive because of the cost of using more raw materials and expensive joining techniques. The rigidity of the walls may seem to be an asset but it is actually a liability for use with concrete fill.
(2) Geocells made from fabricsGeocells made from fabrics are both floppy and porous with the following disadvantages :
|
|
Feature |
Hyson - Cells |
Geocells made from thick plastic sheeting |
Factors affecting price of geocell |
||
Raw material |
Made from thin 200µ plastic film. Least expensive raw material per sq. m of wall area. |
Heavy duty 500 to 2000 micron sheet. Between twice to five times the cost of Hyson Cells raw material. |
Production |
Heat sealing technology. High capacity. Inexpensive to set up plant. |
Ultra sonic welding. Low volumes, expensive plant |
Factors affecting cost of installation |
||
Ease of rigging large areas |
Standard module is 200 m² -max practical size for handling with labour. Larger 500 m² modules can be manufactured for installation with plant. Can be easily cut and joined on site. Supplied with integral laced rigging ex factory. |
15 m > 2 packs. Needs special frame to hold the pack open |
Ease of filling |
High speed filling with high slump, self levelling concrete. |
High speed filling also possible, but areas smaller as small packs entail much joining. |
Speed of installation with one team |
1000 to 2000 m² per day |
200 to 500 m² per day |
Weight (freight and on site handling) |
± 40 kg (expands to 200 m²) |
±30 kg ( expands to 15 m²) |
Packed volume (freight and on site handling ) |
0.15 m³ (expands to 200 m² x 0.1 m) |
|
Range of cell sizes and cell depths |
||
Cell cavity sizes |
50 mm x 50 mm to 800mm x 800mm |
203mm x244 mm to 488mm x406mm |
Depth of cells |
50 mm to 4,000 mm (special 10,000mm) |
152 to 203 mm |
Opened length of 1 cell mat |
1 metre to 100 metres |
2.4 metre to 6.1 metres |
Opened width of 1 cell mat |
1 metre to 30 metres (standard 7.x 30 ) |
2.4 metres to 6.1 metres |
Standard mat sizes |
100 to 500 m² (depending on application) |
15 m² |
TECHNICAL |
||
Load bearing |
Mechanical interlock Deformation in vertical plane is ± 5 mm. Blocks cannot "punch through" and limiting factor for load bearing is therefore shear strength of the concrete .
Impermeable walls The walls are impermeable. The cell slab is a matrix of perfectly interlocking discrete blocks. Loads are therefore distributed across the network of mechanical joints. |
Friction A plane textured vertical cell wall has improved friction but the limiting factor for load bearing is the shear strength of the plastic . If this is exceeded the blocks can "punch through".
Impermeable walls Although the walls are impermeable this is no advantage to load bearing as the plane faces give no vertical interlock.
|
Waterproofing |
The concrete does not adhere to the walls. Unrestrained concrete will not crack on drying and the shrinkage will result in minute gaps between the cast block and the cell wall. In practice it has been observed that Hyson Cells canals are as waterproof as conventional concrete canals equipped with joints. |
Although a textured surface encourages the cement to adhere to the walls waterproofing is likely to be similar to that of the Hyson Cell slab. |
Release of hydrostatic pressure |
The concrete does not adhere to the walls. Hydrostatic pressure may vent around entire perimeter of each cast block. |
Similar to Hyson Cells but bonding of concrete with textured finish will lead to some degradation of the property.. |
Undesirable flow of concrete across cell boundaries underneath the cell mat to form an underlying slab. (The underlying slab can experience uncontrolled cracking some millimetres thick which then propagates through the cell slab) |
Cells are anchored to the underlying material and drawn into intimate contact with it by means of the integral laced rigging. The cell walls are flexible and so some inaccuracy of levels can be tolerated. |
Rigid cell walls will bridge any hollows thus allowing the concrete to flow underneath the cells. |
Over filling of the cells to form an overlaying slab (which again leads to uncontrolled cracking which may propagate) |
Hyson cells rigging supports the cells during filling and allows the cells to be struck off level with the top of the cell walls |
The rigidity of the cells means that the top of the cell walls remains level during filling. These cells can also be struck off easy with the top of the cell walls |
Edge termination |
Cells are flexible and can be draped to follow a radius of 100 mm to 200 mm (depending on cell depth). This allows a "tuck-in"termination edge beam to combat potential undercutting edge damage. |
Due to rigidity of the cells the edge termination methods are more limited, consume more material and are more costly. |
Maximum incline of an embankment |
70° |
50° |
Feature |
Hyson - Cells |
Geocells made from glued or stitched woven or non-woven fabric |
Factors affecting price of geocell |
||
Raw material |
Made from thin 200µ plastic film. Least expensive raw material per sq m of wall area. |
Between twice and three times the cost of Hyson Cells material. |
Production |
Heat sealing technology. High capacity. Inexpensive to set up plant. |
Glueing is inexpensive but gives doubtful joining, especially in wet conditions. Stitching of a honeycomb cell matrix is labour based and slow. |
Factors affecting cost of installation |
||
Ease of rigging large areas |
Standard module is 200 m² -max practical size for handling with labour. Larger 500 m² modules can be manufactured for installation with plant. Can be easily cut and joined on site. Supplied with integral laced rigging ex factory. |
Packs are 50 m² to 100 m². They are not equiped with laced rigging and can not be easily rigged taut. enough so as not to collapse when filled with concrete. Should they collapse they are not redeemable and a costly halt in production results. |
Ease of filling |
High speed filling with high slump, self levelling concrete. |
Liable to collapse if filled with concrete as cells are not rigid. Cells should be carefully filled individually |
Speed of installation with one team |
1000 to 2000 m² per day |
50 to 100 m² per day |
Weight (freight and on site handling) |
± 40 kg (expands to 200 m²) |
± 50 kg (expands to 50m²) |
Packed volume (freight and on site handling ) |
0.15 m³ (expands to 200 m² x 0.1 m) |
|
Range of cell sizes and cell depths |
||
Cell cavity sizes |
50 mm x 50 mm to 800mm x 800mm |
150 mm x 150 mm to 400mm x 400mm |
Depth of cells |
50 mm to 4,000 mm (special 10,000mm) |
75 mm to 1000 mm |
Opened length of 1 cell mat |
1 metre to 100 metres |
I metre to 10 metres |
Opened width of 1 cell mat |
1 metre to 30 metres (standard 7.x 30 ) |
1 metre to 10 metres. |
Standard mat sizes |
100 to 500 m² (depending on application) |
50 to 100 m² |
TECHNICAL |
||
Load bearing |
Mechanical interlock Deformation in vertical plane is ± 5 mm. Blocks cannot "punch through" and limiting factor for load bearing is therefore shear strength of the concrete .
Impermeable walls The walls are impermeable. The cell slab is a matrix of perfectly interlocking discrete blocks. Loads are therefore distributed across the network of mechanical joints. |
Friction A plane textured vertical cell wall has improved friction but the limiting factor for load bearing is the shear strength of the cement impregnated fabric . Blocks can "punch through" Permeable walls The cement paste can penetrate and soak the fabric. Each block is therefore bonded to its neighbour. Initial load bearing will improve but the bonding will shear under increased loads. |
Waterproofing |
The concrete does not adhere to the walls. Unrestrained concrete will not crack on drying and the shrinkage will result in minute gaps between the cast block and the cell wall. In practice it has been observed that Hyson Cells canals are as waterproof as conventional concrete canals equiped with joints. |
The walls are permeable and each block will be bonded to its neighbour. On drying the free shrinkage strain will exceed the tensile strain capacity and "uncontrolled cracks" of 1-2 mm can result. Such cracking is unacceptable for water containing structures and for road paving.. |
Release of hydrostatic pressure |
The concrete does not adhere to the walls. Hydrostatic pressure may vent around entire perimeter of each cast block. |
Saturation of the cell wall with cement paste will effectively prevent release of hydrostatic pressure until the bond is broken (whereupon failure can be expected to result due to pumping of fines through the large cracks) |
Undesirable flow of concrete across cell boundaries underneath the cell mat to form an underlying slab. (The underlying slab can experience uncontrolled cracking some millimetres thick which then propagates through the cell slab) |
Cells are anchored to the underlying material and drawn into intimate contact with it by means of the integral laced rigging. The cell walls are flexible and so some inaccuracy of levels can be tolerated. |
The material is light weight and is not equiped with rigging. Unless very many securing anchor pegs are used the cell mat will "float"and allow concrete to flow underneath. |
Over filling of the cells to form an overlaying slab (which again leads to uncontrolled cracking which may propagate) |
Hyson cells rigging supports the cells during filling and allows the cells to be struck off level with the top of the cell walls |
The cell walls are not supported by rigging and are liable to collapse during filling. Striking off is therefore difficult. |
Edge termination |
Cells are flexible and can be draped to follow a radius of 100 mm to 200 mm (depending on cell depth). This allows a "tuck-in"termination edge beam to combat potential undercutting edge damage. |
Edge termination methods advised by manufacturer (if any) are not known to us |
Maximum incline of an embankment |
70° |
45° |